Giải đề dự đoán IELTS Writing July 2023: free houses

Đề dự đoán IELTS Writing Task 2, quý 3, tháng 7, 2023. Chủ đề Chính phủ cung cấp nhà ở miễn phí cho những người không có khả năng chi trả.

IELTS Writing Forecast Task Question:

Houses are essential for people. Some people think that the government should offer free houses for people who cannot afford to pay for it. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? (Government)

Detailed Outline 1: for IELTS Writing Task 2


  • Restate the task question: Should the government provide free houses for those unable to afford them?
  • Thesis statement:I agree that the government should provide free houses as it addresses social issues and enhances overall well-being.

Body paragraph 1: The necessity of free housing for those in need

  • Topic sentence: Free houses are vital for meeting basic human needs.
  • Reason: Housing is a fundamental necessity for a dignified life.
  • Result: Inadequate housing leads to challenges like shelter insecurity, compromised health, and lack of stability.
  • Example: A single parent unable to afford housing can provide stability and enable focus on education and career development.
  • Counterargument:Some argue free houses promote dependency.
  • Rebuttal: Accompany free houses with educational and vocational programs for self-sufficiency.

Body paragraph 2: Social and economic benefits of offering free houses

  • Topic sentence: Providing free houses has wide-ranging societal benefits.
  • Benefit: Reduced homelessness rates and improved public health.
  • Result: Safer, cleaner, and more vibrant communities.
  • Comparison: Cost of homelessness-related services outweighs investment in free houses.
  • Example: Programs combining free houses and support services decrease homelessness, leading to lower healthcare costs and reduced crime rates.
  • Counterargument: Opponents prioritize resources for education or infrastructure.
  • Rebuttal: Adequate housing is foundational for individuals to thrive, participate in society, pursue education, gain employment, and contribute to economic growth.


  • Recap main points and restate the thesis.
  • Emphasize the importance of providing free houses for those in need and its positive impact on individuals, communities, and society.

Model Essay 1

Housing is a fundamental necessity for individuals, but many cannot afford it. I agree that the government should provide free houses for those unable to pay. This approach addresses social issues, such as shelter insecurity and compromised health, while enhancing overall well-being.

Free houses are crucial for meeting basic human needs, as adequate housing is essential for leading a dignified life.  Without it, individuals face numerous challenges, including shelter insecurity, compromised health conditions, and a lack of stability. Scientific findings support this claim, revealing that individuals without housing experience higher rates of health issues, including respiratory illnesses and mental health disorders, compared to those with stable homes. In such cases, providing free houses not only offers a safe and secure environment but also empowers individuals to focus on other aspects of their lives, such as education and career development. However, some argue that free houses promote dependency. To address this concern, the government should accompany free houses with educational and vocational programs that promote self-sufficiency.


Providing free houses offers wide-ranging benefits for society, reducing homelessness rates and fostering safer, cleaner, and more vibrant communities. According to a study by the Hanoi Department of Labour, Invalids and Social Affair (2022), combining free housing with supportive services resulted in a 30% decrease in homelessness rates in Hanoi. The study also revealed that the cost of homelessness-related services, such as emergency shelters and medical care, surpasses the investment required for providing free houses. While opponents may prioritize resources for education or infrastructure, it is essential to acknowledge that adequate housing forms the foundation for individuals to thrive and actively engage in society. Addressing the immediate housing needs of vulnerable populations creates a stable and inclusive environment that facilitates education, employment, and economic growth.

In conclusion, the provision of free houses by the government for those unable to afford them is essential. It addresses social issues, enhances overall well-being, and offers numerous benefits to individuals, communities, and society. It is imperative that governments prioritize affordable housing initiatives to ensure a better future for all.

340 words

Topic vocabulary

English phrasesTranslation
a fundamental necessitymột nhu cầu cơ bản
lead a dignified lifesống một cuộc sống xứng đáng 
experience higher rates of health issuesgặp phải tỷ lệ có vấn đề về sức khỏe cao hơn
a safe and secure environmentmôi trường an toàn và kiên cố
shelter insecuritysự không đảm bảo an toàn về chỗ ở
promote dependencykhuyến khích sự phụ thuộc
offer wide-ranging benefitscung cấp những lợi ích đa dạng
reduce homelessness ratesgiảm tỷ lệ vô gia cư
the immediate housing needsnhu cầu chỗ ở trước mắt
the provision of free housesviệc cung cấp nhà miễn phí
prioritize affordable housing initiativesưu tiên các sáng kiến về nhà ở giá cả phải chăng

Detailed Outline 2: for IELTS Writing Task 2


  • Task question: Should the government provide free houses for those who cannot afford them?
  • Writer’s opinion: Disagree with government providing free houses

Body paragraph 1:

  • Topic sentence: Government-provided free houses undermine personal responsibility and motivation.
  • Reason 1: Individuals should take responsibility for their housing needs.
  • Reason 2: Free houses can create entitlement and dependency.
  • Rebuttal: Temporary assistance and resources are better for individuals to improve their financial situations.

Body paragraph 2:

  • Topic sentence: Providing free houses for everyone is economically unsustainable.
  • Drawback: Burden on government budget.
  • Result: Limited resources should be allocated effectively.
  • Example: Financial challenges and housing quality issues in countries with extensive social housing programs.


  • Recap main points from body paragraphs.
  • Restate writer’s opinion against government providing free houses.

Model Essay 2

The question of whether the government should offer free houses for those unable to afford them has sparked a contentious debate. Personally, I disagree with the notion of the government providing free houses, as I believe it undermines personal responsibility and motivation.

One of the main reasons why I oppose the idea of government-provided free houses is that it undermines personal responsibility and inhibits personal growth and self-sufficiency. Research conducted by the Vietnamese Institute of Social Sciences (2023) reveals that temporary assistance programs, coupled with employment support, have proven to be more effective in helping low-income individuals improve their financial situations and gain independence. By actively encouraging individuals to seek employment and take ownership of their housing needs, these programs foster personal growth and empower individuals to break the cycle of poverty. Conversely, providing free houses can create a sense of entitlement and dependency, hindering upward mobility. Therefore, a comprehensive approach that combines temporary assistance, employment support, and resources is more effective in promoting self-sufficiency and long-term financial stability.


Another significant drawback of providing free houses for everyone is the economic sustainability of such a program. According to a study conducted by the International Monetary Fund (2023), implementing universal free housing would place an immense burden on the government budget, resulting in a diversion of funds from crucial sectors like education, healthcare, and infrastructure. With an extensive social housing system, the government has ended up facing financial challenges, leading to reduced funding for critical public services. Furthermore, the study also highlights that the quality of social housing may suffer, with reports of dilapidated buildings and inadequate living conditions for recipients. Therefore, effective allocation of limited resources and prioritization of targeted assistance programs is necessary to ensure efficient resource utilization and address individuals’ specific needs.

In conclusion, the government providing free houses to those who cannot afford them is not the optimal solution. Such initiatives undermine personal responsibility and motivation, creating entitlement and dependency. Moreover, the economic unsustainability of providing free houses for everyone poses a significant burden on government budgets.

340 words

Topic vocabulary

English phrasesTranslation
spark a contentious debatekhơi mào một cuộc tranh luận gay gắt
undermines personal responsibility and motivationlàm suy yếu trách nhiệm và động lực cá nhân 
government-provided free housesnhà miễn phí do chính phủ cung cấp
providing free housescung cấp nhà miễn phí
low-income individualsnhững cá nhân thu nhập thấp
break the cycle of povertyphá vỡ vòng nghèo đói
create a sense of entitlement and dependencycảm thấy có quyền và tạo ra sự phụ thuộc
promote self-sufficiencykhuyến khích sự tự cấp
universal free housing (policy)chính sách nhà ở miễn phí chung
place an immense burden on the government budgetđặt gánh nặng khổng lồ lên ngân sách chính phủ
an extensive social housing systemhệ thống nhà ở xã hội rộng lớn
dilapidated buildingscác tòa nhà xuống cấp
inadequate living conditionsđiều kiện sống thiếu thốn
the economic unsustainabilitysự không bền vững về kinh tế

Check out and follow for more IELTS forecast:

Trả lời

Email của bạn sẽ không được hiển thị công khai. Các trường bắt buộc được đánh dấu *