Giải đề dự đoán IELTS Writing July 2023: sell unhealthy food and drink

Đề dự đoán IELTS forecast 2023 Writing Task 2, quý 3, tháng 7, 2023 chủ đề cấm việc bán các thực phẩm và đồ uống có hại cho sức khỏe.

IELTS Writing Forecast Task Question:

Shops should not be allowed to sell any food or drink that have been scientifically proved to be bad for people’s health. To what extent do you agree or disagree? (Social)

Detailed Outline: for IELTS Writing Task 2

Introduction:

• Unhealthy food and beverages in shops raise questions about public health and seller responsibility.
• Thesis: Shops should not be allowed to sell scientifically proven harmful food and drink.

Body Paragraph 1: Negative health consequences and the need for regulation

• Topic sentence: Prohibit the sale of proven unhealthy food and beverages.
• Reason: High sugar content and related health issues.
  • Explanation: Excessive sugar consumption leads to weight gain.
  • Explanation: Obesity increases the risk of diabetes and cardiovascular problems.
  • Example: Studies show a direct link between sugar-laden products and obesity rates.
• Result: Restricting sales helps combat the obesity epidemic.
• Counterargument: Personal choice should determine consumption.
• Rebuttal: Individuals may not be fully aware or make informed decisions, requiring external regulation.

Body Paragraph 2: Economic and societal benefits of banning harmful products

• Topic sentence: Ban scientifically proven harmful food and drink for positive outcomes.
• Benefit 1: Reduced healthcare costs.
  • Explanation: Consumption of unhealthy products increases healthcare expenses.
  • Result: Eliminating them lowers medical costs related to diet-related diseases.
• Benefit 2: Improved public health and productivity.
  • Explanation: Healthier population has fewer sick days and increased productivity.
  • Result: Reduced health issues lead to a higher quality of life.
  • Result: Productivity gains positively impact the economy.
• Counterargument: Initial economic challenges for businesses due to changes in product offerings.
• Rebuttal: Long-term benefits outweigh short-term setbacks.

Conclusion: 

• Restate thesis: Shops should be prohibited from selling scientifically proven harmful food and drink.
• Implementing restrictions prioritizes citizen well-being and fosters a healthier future.

.

Model Essay

Unhealthy food and beverages available for purchase in shops raise concerns about public health and the responsibility of sellers. I strongly support the idea of banning the sale of scientifically proven harmful food and drink.

To safeguard public health, it is crucial to enforce regulations that prohibit the sale of proven unhealthy food and beverages. The excessive sugar content in these products plays a significant role in various health issues, such as weight gain, which in turn escalates the risk of diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Numerous studies have firmly established a direct correlation between the consumption of sugary products and the alarming rise in obesity rates. Implementing restrictions on sales becomes an effective strategy in combatting the obesity epidemic. Despite arguments advocating for personal choice, it is important to recognize that many individuals lack awareness or make uninformed decisions, underscoring the necessity for external regulation.

.

The prohibition of scientifically proven harmful food and drink brings substantial benefits to the economy and society. By curbing the consumption of unhealthy products, it significantly reduces healthcare costs. For example, removing these items from the market could lead to a decrease in medical costs associated with diet-related diseases, allowing for more efficient allocation of healthcare resources. Additionally, promoting a healthier population results in fewer sick days, leading to improved productivity. In fact, studies have shown that a 10% reduction in the prevalence of diet-related diseases could save billions of dollars annually in healthcare expenses. Moreover, these productivity gains have a positive ripple effect on the overall economy. Although businesses may initially face economic challenges, the long-term advantages far outweigh the short-term setbacks.

In conclusion, it is imperative to prohibit shops from selling scientifically proven harmful food and drink. By implementing necessary restrictions, we prioritize the well-being of individuals and foster a healthier future for society.

301 words

Topic vocabulary