Giải đề dự đoán IELTS Writing July 2023: full-time education til 18 years old

Đề dự đoán IELTS Writing Task 2, quý 2 và quý 3 năm 2023 chủ đề học sinh bắt buộc phải theo học chương trình giáo dục toàn thời gian tới năm 18 tuổi.

IELTS Writing Forecast Task Question:

Some people say that all young people should be required to stay in full-time education until they are at least 18 years old. To what extent do you agree or disagree? (Education)

Detailed Outline: for IELTS Writing Task 2

Introduction:

• Topic: Mandatory full-time education until age 18 debated.
• Writer’s opinion: Disagree, support alternative pathways in education.

Body Paragraph 1:

• Topic Sentence: Compulsory education till 18 restricts freedom, hampers personal growth.
• Reason: At 16-17, young people discover passions, hindered by mandatory education.
• Result: Lack of practical experience may disconnect academics from employability.
• Rebuttal: Education can vary, not all thrive in traditional academics.

Body Paragraph 2:

• Topic Sentence: Compulsory education at 18 burdens institutions and economy.
• Benefit: Flexibility lets youth enter the workforce, eases strain on schools.
• Drawback: Full-time education saturates job market, competition lowers wages.
• Example: Countries with flexible systems see higher job satisfaction and productivity.

Conclusion:

• Compulsory education disregards individual differences and aspirations.
• Hinders personal development and limits freedom.
• Alternative pathways like vocational training needed for a well-rounded society.

.

Model Essay

The mandatory full-time education until the age of 18 has sparked debates among educators and policymakers. In this essay, I respectfully disagree with the notion, advocating for diverse educational pathways that respect individual aspirations and choices.

Compulsory education until the age of 18 can restrict personal development and limit freedom. During the ages of 16-17, many youth often discover their passions and interests in their desired professions. Nevertheless, mandatory schooling can impede their capacity to explore these interests and gather hands-on experience in their chosen fields. Consequently, this lack of exposure to the real world can create a divide between academic qualifications and employability, resulting in a workforce possessing theoretical knowledge but lacking practical skills. It is true that some argue for mandatory education as a means to ensure a well-rounded and knowledgeable society. However, it is crucial to acknowledge that education takes various forms, and traditional academic settings may not cater to everyone’s learning style or career objectives.

.

Enforcing compulsory education until the age of 18 imposes significant burdens on both educational institutions and the economy as a whole. To my mind, granting young individuals the freedom to enter the workforce upon completing basic education can alleviate the strain on schools, enabling them to allocate improved resources and support to those who genuinely aspire to pursue higher education. In contrast, mandatory schooling may contribute to an abundance of entry-level positions in the labor market, leading to heightened competition and potentially lower wages for such roles. Conversely, countries that have embraced flexible education systems, such as vocational training programs, have observed heightened job satisfaction and productivity among their workforce, as individuals discover roles that align harmoniously with their unique skills and interests. This harmonization ultimately fosters an environment that benefits both the individuals and the overall economy, promoting a more diversified and efficient workforce.

In conclusion, compulsory full-time education until 18 disregards the diverse aspirations and differences among young individuals. It hampers personal development and freedom, creating a need for alternative pathways such as vocational training to foster a well-rounded society that respects individual choices in education.

.

347 words

.

Topic vocabulary