Tất cả từ vựng IELTS theo chủ đề và ý tưởng để viết IELTS Writing task 2 về chủ đề higher education funding. Task question 1: Some people believe that university education should only be offered to those who can pay for their own courses and the government should not be expected to fund higher education. To what extent do you agree? Write at least 250 words. Key words: paraphrasing 5 ways to paraphrase ”university education” Postsecondary education College learning Academic training Degree studies Higher education. 5 ways to paraphrase”pay for their own courses” Cover the cost of their classes Pay for their own tuition Fund their own studies Finance their own instruction Underwrite their own training. 5 ways to paraphrase”be expected to fund” Be obligated to finance Be liable to bear the cost Be required to pay for Be compelled to finance Be obligated to provide financial resources. 5 ways to paraphrase the topic: Some think that only those with enough money should be able to attend university, and not the taxpayers. It has been suggested that college learning should not be financed by taxpayers; it's up to the individual to pay for classes. There is a viewpoint that individuals should be responsible for covering the cost of their own tuition, not the government. According to some, academic training ought to be self-funded - the state should not have to pay for higher education. Several people opine that only those who can underwrite their own training should benefit from degree studies, and not receive any kind of public funding. Brainstorming - generating ideas 5 reasons why university education should only be offered to those who can pay for their courses Students are more likely to take their studies seriously if they have made a financial investment. Financial investment can help ensure that students have the resources they need to be successful. It can help discourage students who are not serious about learning or who do not have the means to pay for their education. It incentivizes students to complete their studies since they have already paid for it. Paying for education can help ensure that university has enough funds to provide quality education. 5 results when university education should only be offered to those who can pay for their courses Increased competition among students for a limited number of spots. Rising tuition costs due to less public funding. Greater socio-economic disparities in access to education. Inability for low-income students to attend university without financial assistance. Decrease in student mobility and diversity within universities. 5 reasons why the government should fund higher education Financial aid would ensure that all students have access to university education regardless of socio-economic background. Public funding for higher education can help broaden the skills and knowledge base of the population. It can lead to greater economic development through job creation, innovation, and productivity. Investing in education can help build a more educated and informed citizenry. Providing financial assistance can reduce the burden of debt on students by lowering the cost of tuition. 5 reasons why the government should not fund higher education It can lead to excessive government spending and debt. Universities may become more bureaucratic and inefficient when government funds are involved. It can harm private universities as they may lose students to public institutions. It could discourage students from making responsible financial decisions, as they may believe they will be taken care of by the government. The allocation of government funds to higher education may reduce funds available for other important programs such as healthcare and infrastructure. 5 results when higher education is not funded by the government Reduced number of students attending university due to lack of financial aid. Reduced quality of education and student learning due to lower funding. Increase in tuition costs due to lack of government subsidies and funding. Greater socio-economic disparities, as many lower-income students may not have enough resources to pursue a university education. Potential for universities to become more focused on making profits instead of educational excellence. 5 benefits and 5 drawbacks of government funding higher education Benefits: Increased access to education for citizens with all income levels. Reduced tuition costs, making higher education more affordable. Improved quality of education and student learning due to increased funding. Greater economic development through job creation, innovation and productivity. Improved citizenry through the building of a more educated public. Drawbacks: Excessive government spending and debt. Universities may become less efficient and more bureaucratic. Private universities may lose students to public institutions. Potential for students to become less responsible financially as they may feel taken care of by the government. Reduction of funds available for other important government programs. 5 opinions on paying for university education Paying for university education ensures that students take their studies seriously. It can help ensure that students have the resources they need to be successful. It incentivizes students to complete their studies since they have already paid for it. Paying for higher education can promote economic development. It can help provide universities funds to provide quality education. 5 examples of paying for university education Government grants and scholarships. Loan forgiveness programs. Government subsidies to universities to keep tuition costs down. Work-study programs in which students can work part-time while in school and have their tuition partially covered by the government. Tax credits and deductions for tuition payments, Model paragraphs Paragraph 1: Investing in higher education can have a substantial positive impact on society. Financial aid from the government would ensure that all students have access to University regardless of socio-economic background. This can lead to increased economic development through job creation, innovation, and productivity. Additionally, public funding for higher education can help broaden the skills and knowledge base of the population and can help build a more educated and informed citizenry. Paragraph 2: The government should be mindful of the potential drawbacks of providing financial assistance to universities. Excessive government spending and debt can result from this decision, as well as universities becoming more bureaucratic and inefficient when government funds are involved. Furthermore, it could reduce competitive pressure on universities by making private institutions lose students to public ones, and reduce the funds available for other important programs such as healthcare and infrastructure. Paragraph 3: When higher education is not funded by the government, universities become more focused on making profits instead of educational excellence. With fewer resources and limited funds, universities may cut back on student services, quality of instruction, or research opportunities in order to stay afloat financially. They may also look for other ways to generate revenue, such as increasing enrollment or introducing new tuition packages that do not necessarily provide the best value for students. As a result, universities may be more focused on revenue generation than on providing high-quality education. Paragraph 4: When university education is only offered to those who can pay for it, there may be increased competition among students for a limited number of spots. Rising tuition costs due to less public funding may also result in an inability for low-income students to attend university without financial assistance. This could lead to greater socio-economic disparities in access to education and decrease student mobility and diversity within universities. Paragraph 5: One benefit of government funding higher education is that it can help ensure that all citizens have access to university regardless of their socio-economic background. Financial aid from the government can reduce the burden of debt on students by lowering the cost of tuition. Additionally, investing in education can lead to greater economic development through job creation, innovation, and productivity, as well as build a more educated and informed citizenry. IELTS Essay: Some people believe that university education should only be offered to those who can pay for their own courses and the government should not be expected to fund higher education. To what extent do you agree? Write at least 250 words. Outline: I. Introduction: Thesis statement indicating agreement with the opinion that university education should be provided to those who can pay their own courses and do not require government funding II. Body 1: Argument 1 in favor of the opinion; e.g. discussing the importance of taking responsibility for obtaining an education III. Body 2: Argument 2 in favor of the opinion; e.g. how government-funded universities may become overburdened and lack the necessary resources to provide a high-quality education IV. Conclusion: Summarize the arguments and reiterate the thesis IELTS Model Essay: The idea that only those who can pay for their own postsecondary education should be offered university courses and government should not finance higher education has generated considerable debate in recent years. While some disagree, I believe this is beneficial to both individuals and society in general. Firstly, those seeking to obtain a college degree should be self-reliant and take responsibility for financing their degree studies. It is more gratifying to have achieved something when you have worked hard and earned it. Furthermore, there is a deeper sense of commitment when each tuition payment is made personally. This also serves to ensure individuals only pursue courses they are truly passionate about and committed to. Secondly, taking the burden of covering academic training off of the government helps avoid education systems becoming overburdened, leading to classes being overcrowded and a lack of proper resources for students. Especially in developing countries, allocating taxpayers' money may not be possible, or the best use of the funds. If students bear the brunt of the costs, better utilized resources can be employed and more students can benefit from a higher quality learning experience. In conclusion, although some may oppose the notion that only those who can fund their own instruction should be offered university courses, I would stress the advantages of this approach. Self-reliance is empowered and education systems are spared from becoming overburdened, allowing the resources to be better allocated and more students to reap the benefits of high-quality learning experiences. Paraphrasing: University Education: Postsecondary education, College learning, Academic training, Degree studies, Higher education Pay for their own courses: Cover the cost of their classes, Pay for their own tuition, Fund their own studies, Finance their own instruction, Underwrite their own training Fund higher education: Finance higher learning, Subsidize college studies, Endow college learning, Bankroll further education, Back up advanced learning Advanced language for IELTS: C1: Self-reliant Take responsibility Gratifying achievement Deeper sense of commitment Truly passionate Burden of covering academic training C2: Overburdened education systems Classes being overcrowded Lack of proper resources Allocating taxpayers' money Bear the brunt of the costs Better utilized resources Higher quality learning experience Từ vựng và ý tưởng cho bài viết IELTS writing task 2 chủ đề: Funding higher education Tham khảo Nguồn từ vựng cho các chủ đề được hỏi nhiều nhất trong IELTS Writing task 2 tại đây